ph.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Canon PowerShot SD750 Digital ELPH / IXUS 75



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon PowerShot SD750 Digital ELPH / IXUS 75

Testseek.com have collected 32 expert reviews of the Canon PowerShot SD750 Digital ELPH / IXUS 75 and the average rating is 72%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon PowerShot SD750 Digital ELPH / IXUS 75.
 
(72%)
32 Reviews
Users
(91%)
321 Reviews
72 0 100 32

 

Reviews

page 1 of 4
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2008-02-15, review by: Pcwelt.de

  • Abstract:  Canons 7,1-Megapixler Digital Ixus 75 bietet einen elektronischen Bildstabilisator via High-ISO, 17 Motivprogramme und eine Zeitraffer-Videofunktion. Darüber ist sie dank des Canon-typischen Kreisdesigns auch was fürs Auge. Bildqualität: Die Canon Di...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-09-26, review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • The Canon IXUS 75 is a great supplement to an SLR for those with a little more camera experience, but it may be a daunting camera for point-and-shoot novices, who may be bettered served by the less expensive BenQ DC-T700. Paul Monckton Lowest online p...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2007-09-17, review by: CNET.co.uk

  • Excellent picture quality; large screen; smart styling; good video
  • Lack of features
  • Although the Canon Digital IXUS 75 doesnt have many whistles and bells, the large screen and smart styling easily make up for what is by todays standards an undistinguished spec sheet. Above all, picture quality is excellent for this size of compact...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(72%)
 
  Published: 2007-08-23, review by: whatdigitalcamera.com

  • Abstract:  Following our review of Canon’s Ixus 70 in June’s issue, this alternative launched at the same time offers much the same specification but sacrifices the viewfinder and opts for a 3in LCD screen in its place. The same 3x optical zoom an

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2007-08-16, review by: photographyblog.com

  • The Canon Digital IXUS 75 is a stylish, well-made, responsive point-and-shoot digital camera that successfully recalls the original IXUS design and which thankfully doesnt sacrifice substance for style. The IXUS 75 is a tiny and slim camera that both...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-08-13, review by: digitalcamerainfo.com

  • High resolution 3-inch LCD screen Compact body Trendy and fashionable design Sturdy construction Nearly perfect color production Excellent pictures in low light
  • No optical zoom in movies Expensive No internal memory Zoom backfires Noisy images Tiny controls
  • The Canon PowerShot SD750 has a feature set similar to other digital cameras on the market except for its massive LCD screen – and it has increasing competition in this area, too. The 3-inch LCD is awesome because of its huge previews, readable menu...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-08-13, review by: Chip.de

  • Abstract:  Der Klassiker von Canon in der aktuellen Version: Die Ixus 75 ist eine formschöne, praktische Minikamera mit guter Bildqualität und großem 3-Zoll-Display.

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(62%)
 
  Published: 2007-08-04, review by: v3.co.uk

  • Abstract:  A compact digicam with good performance

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-07-10, Author: Cliff , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Abstract:  Back in December last year I reviewed the Canon Digital IXUS 65 , a potentially great little 6MP pocket compact which was let down in the end by some unfortunate image quality issues. Only its exemplary build quality and performance saved it from a severe...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2007-07-02, review by: Neocamera.com

  • Abstract:  Here is another good digital camera from Canon, although this particular mode fell short of the excellent Canon Powershot SD1000. In terms of specifications, these models differ only in the size of the LCD (3" vs 2.5") and the lack of an optical viewf...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
    page 1 of 4 « Previous   1 2 3 4   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×