ph.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Testseek.com have collected 17 expert reviews of the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM.
 
(85%)
17 Reviews
Users
(80%)
1 Reviews
85 0 100 17

 

Reviews

page 1 of 2
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-05-10, Author: Ľuboslav , review by: pcrevue.sk

  • Displej, veľmi rýchle zaostrovanie, excelentná ostrosť v strede obrazu, výborná kresba v rohoch, výborný stabilizátor
  • Plastové telo

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-22, Author: Yuri小白 , review by: xitek.com

  • Abstract:  佳能EFS55-250mmF4-5.6IS镜头上市以来,网上口碑甚好,尤其分辩率,不少评测给了较高评价。我一直想找一只轻便的小像场长焦头来代替EF70-300mmF4-5.6IS,因为这只全副镜头的体积和重量都让我很不方便。恰逢EFS55-250问世,便收了一只。本来我对这只仅售1650元的镜头是没有什么奢望的,但网上吹捧之声甚隆,有人认为它的分辩率胜过了EF70-300,或者与之相当。在好奇驱使之下,我让这2只镜头小小的PK了一场。我关心的问题是:1,EFS55-250的长焦端分辩率是不是这么神奇,真的...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-09, Author: 吉姆林 , review by: mobile01.com

  • Abstract:  Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM第一代於2005年發表,當時同梯但不同連的還有Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM,這兩顆鏡頭在當時都可說是原廠鏡的一時之選,主攻平價望遠與旅遊鏡市場;上個月初小編已帶來Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM的評測報導,這次要為大家介紹的就是小小黑二代目「Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM」,相隔11年多才更新的鏡頭究竟帶來多少改變呢?開放畫質的提升、Nan...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-04-08, review by: practicalphotography.com

  • Abstract:  At £432 the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM lens should come with a lens hood, but it doesn’t. However, it does come with a soft case to protect against scuffs and scrapes and features an Ultra-low dispersion (UD) element and Super Spectra coatings to...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-12-20, review by: Slrgear.com

  • Abstract:  Test NotesEvery now and then, you really do get more than you pay for, and the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM is proof positive of this. When we ran this lens through its paces in our lab, we were flat-out astonished by the optical quality it delivered....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
 
  Published: 2011-06-01, review by: dpexpert.com.au

  • This is a sweet and smooth lens in use. Auto focus is fast enough and the feel of zoom and focus controls is good. It is light enough to carry around without getting a pain in the neck, yet not so light that there are worries about durability.
  • There is slight barrel distortion at the wide end – nothing to worry about in field use – and slightly more pincushion at the 300mm end. It is easy enough to correct in Photoshop.
  • Canon produces a bewildering array of lenses in this zoom range. By our count there are four 70–200mm lenses and three 70–300. The best lenses are those that have a constant maximum aperture across the zoom range and in which the barrel length does n...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-04-27, review by: digitalfotoforalla.se

  • Abstract:  Toppkvalitet får man i det nya, vita EF 70-300mm F4.0-5.6L IS USM för över 10 000 kronor, men det här hänger faktiskt med fint. Autofokusen har bra precision, även på långa brännvidder, och är sammantaget näst snabbast i detta test. Bildstabiliserin...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-04-27, review by: digitalfoto.dk

  • Abstract:  Topkvalitet får man i den nye, hvide EF 70-300mm F4.0-5.6L IS USM til over 10.000 kroner, men denne er faktisk meget godt med. Autofokus er kontant og præcist, selv på de lange brændvidder, og er samlet testens hurtigste. Der er indbygget billedstabili...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2010-12-23, review by: magnus.de

  • Abstract:  Mit moderaten 450 Euro lässt sich Canon das 70–300 bezahlen. Und dafür gibt es einen Bildstabilisator und ein optisch absolut überzeugendes Objektiv. Die gute Schärfe verbessert sich beim Abblenden nur geringfügig. Absolut empfehlenswertes Telezoom fü...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-11-28, review by: whatdigitalcamera.com

  • Good allrounder
  • Lack of IF

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(88%)
    page 1 of 2 « Previous   1 2   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×