Abstract: I just finished testing the new Canon prosumer DSLR, 50D and its one nice camera. It offers many improvements over the previous model, the 40D. Its easier to use than the 40D, is the same size, actually weighs less yet outperforms it in almost every c...
Abstract: Kein Quantensprung, sondern Detailpflege steht beim Modellwechsel von der EOS 40D zur 50D auf der Tagesordnung. Am bewährten Chassis aus Magnesiumlegierung hat sich ebenso wenig geändert wie an den Abmessungen oder am Gewicht. Die Kamera liegt hervor...
Abstract: ußerlich wirkt die EOS 50D altbekannt, die Neuerungen des 1.300-Euro-Modells stecken unter der Haube: 15,1 Megapixel auf einem getunten CMOS-Sensor (APS-C) und der Digic-4-Prozessor verschaffen Canon einen Startvorteil. Ob der bis ins Ziel hält, beleu...
No real groundbreaking change, unintuitive menus, metering issues in difficult light
What to make of the Canon EOS 50D? On the one hand, there are several ‘upgrades’ on the 40D that will appeal to a range of photographers. If you’re someone who needs to either enlarge your prints or values the ability to crop your images...
Abstract: EOS 50D udfylder tomrummet mellem EOS 450D og EOS 5D - nu snart EOS 5D Mark II - og er en meget heldigt udført sammensmeltning mellem Canons professionelle D-SLR-modeller og de mere fotoamatørorienterede. Klik på billedet for at se det i et større form...
High-quality images, Hardly any digital noise, Rugged, solid construction, Excellent 3-inch screen, Live View better than expected
Expensive, Live View is still overrated, Fairly steep learning curve for newbies, No protective cover for LCD, *
If the EOS 50D were less expensive, it would be a shoe-in for our Editor’s Choice designation. But at close to $1,399 for the body alone, that’s a lot of jack to cough up, especially when the 12.3 MP Nikon D90 is available for only $999. ...
Tout juste un an après la sortie de l'EOS 40D, Canon propose un nouveau reflex expert (le Canon EOS 40D reste au catalogue actuel), un peu pressé par la sortie remarquée du Nikon D300. Pour l'occasion, Canon n'a pas fait les choses à moitié. Le capte...
Fantastic resolution for capturing fine details, Lownoise sensor (albeit with heavy noise reduction at expanded ISOs), Excellent selection of incamera JPEG processing options, Solid durability, Great ability to trigger flash at a variety of shutter speeds, AF system still among the fastest,
Heavy like a lead brick, Overly complicated menus and submenus, Live view interface not very intuitive, Default processing a little flat, AF accuracy not consistent,
My personal expectations for the 50D were a mixture of highs and lows; experience has taught me that Canon's updates to their mid-range DSLRs usually tend to be evolutionary, but I honestly expected to see some significant improvements over the old Can...
qualité des images, gestion du bruit à 800 ISO et même à 1600 ISO, balance des blancs dans lensemble, vélocité du processeur DIGIC IV, ergonomie, clarté du menu, qualité de lécran, bon rap...
tropicalisation sommaire, solidité (comparée au D300), pas de AF continue en LiveView.
Face au mi-lourd Nikon D300, Canon brandit enfin son EOS 50D, un reflex tout aussi convaincant et comparable en termes de vélocité de prise de vue et surtout de qualité dimages, en particulier en basse lumière. Mais si son ...
